(September 11, 2017 at 5:28 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(September 11, 2017 at 5:12 pm)Whateverist Wrote: Maybe we're just dumbstruck that anyone would seriously think this sort of thing could be persuasive to anyone who hadn't already imbibed plenty of the Koolade.
The point isn't to persuade, it's to start a conversation. You guys repeatedly ask for evidence because you think none exists, You're clearly not equipped to deal with any modicum of evidence that's presented other than deflection.
I've also posted evidence that was tested extensively, and it funny how quick you guys turn on science when it doesn't support your world view.
Actually I think people are really saying they're familiar with the standard of evidence presented by Christianity and remain unimpressed. In the back and forth it may sound as if someone is challenging you to actually produce any 'evidence' at all, but I don't think that is really where it's at.
In this thread Steve's OP seems to intended to simply shoot down the atheist rejoinder "why then do you reject the evidence for other religions". But Lady Camus' point that a higher stack of weak evidence isn't really all that impressive, unless you're just determined to believe regardless and desperate for justification.
