Is Accepting Christian Evidence Special Pleading?

[Redbeard The Pink]

This charge comes up from time to on this forum. 

First, let's define our terms:

Special Pleading: Applying standards, principles, and/or rules to other people or circumstances, while making oneself or certain circumstances exempt from the same critical criteria, without providing adequate justification. Special pleading is often a result of strong emotional beliefs that interfere with reason. reference

Evidence: Evidence is not proof. It is a fact that supports a conclusion. For the purposes of this discussion, eyewitness testimony (from any religion) is evidence.  

Central Question: Is it true that other religions have bodies of evidence that can be examined in the same or similar way as Christianity's is and therefore are legitimate comparisons in which special pleading can actually occur?

Is there any debate that no major religion that has a fraction of the amount of evidence of Christianity to even examine in support of its main claims? If other religions do not have a body of evidence or there only exists one piece of evidence, then how could there be any special pleading in favor of Christianity? 

If you are tempted to just answer there is no evidence for Christianity, they we are just arguing definitions of words. Whatever you call the material under consideration, there is more of it under Christianity and therefore no special pleading.

Dude...wha...no. What are you even...no.

"Christianity is supported by the BIGGEST pile of trash, and that makes it the best!"

Please tell me that's not what you're going with.

If you're talking about personal testimony of live people, then Christianity wins only by virtue of having the largest number of adherents.

If you're talking about text...no. Most especially if you're talking about ancient texts. Pretty much everything pertinent to Christianity boils down to a little fistful of books that they've all been rewriting and fighting over since ever, and it's not testimony, it's mythology.