(September 11, 2017 at 10:02 pm)mh.brewer Wrote:(September 11, 2017 at 4:53 pm)SteveII Wrote: Christians would accept all evidence provided for Judaism.
Buddhists don't really make any claims that require evidence or that would have evidence.
Hindus have stories that were written down after 400+ years of telling stories about events before those 400 years. What specifically are you proposing as evidence?
Mormons, are you serious? Do you think there is evidence to consider outside Joseph Smith's head?
How nice for you. You asked for a comparison based on quantity alone and then disqualify these religions works based on quality.
You should probably stay in the shallow end.
What is behind the constant condescending digs? It's not just you. Most of you people really can't handle a civil conversation can you? No need to answer. It was a rhetorical question.
Every one of those answers dealt with quantity.
Buddhist = 0 (since they don't make claims that require evidence)
Hindus = what little claims they do make that would have evidence, their gods come from an ancient amalgamation of stories that no one knows the source of. Is that evidence? Since it is the only type they have, it speaks to both quantity and quality.
Mormons = Joseph Smith's head = 1
