RE: Is Accepting Christian Evidence Special Pleading?
September 12, 2017 at 7:44 am
(This post was last modified: September 12, 2017 at 7:46 am by Neo-Scholastic.)
(September 11, 2017 at 4:38 pm)Hammy Wrote:(September 11, 2017 at 4:12 pm)SteveII Wrote: There is very little to investigate in other religions. If you don't agree, give an example.
You are right that the natural theology arguments fallacious arguments given by Aquinas and his ilk could be used for any other monotheism. However, And we have a whole body of evidence stories in and surrounding the NT to consider that is not generic as generic as any other holy book and has no equal in is just as silly and unimpressive as other religions.
I fixed that for you.
A lot of atheists say the cosmological arguments of Aquinas are fallacious but none have yet revealed any flaws in his impeccable logic. Since I am feeling generous I'll just assume you mistakenly relied on the pronouncements of some authority or were swayed by the confident tone of some YouTube video.
But really the topic is essentially whether the claims of the Christian faith are categorically different than those of other faiths and it is pretty obvious that they are.
