(September 12, 2017 at 7:44 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:(September 11, 2017 at 4:38 pm)Hammy Wrote: I fixed that for you.
A lot of atheists say the cosmological arguments of Aquinas are fallacious but none have yet revealed any flaws in his impeccable logic. Since I am feeling generous I'll just assume you mistakenly relied on the pronouncements of some authority or were swayed by the confident tone of some YouTube video.
But really the topic is essentially whether the claims of the Christian faith are categorically different than those of other faiths and it is pretty obvious that they are.
Aquinas was a primitive shit who didn't know what the fuck he was talking about.
http://www.vorpal.us/2007/10/the-five-wa...dead-ends/
Quote:St. Thomas was a pretty good logician, but the unscientific and erroneous beliefs held in his time makes many of his conclusions irrelevant now that we know the universe better. St. Thomas used the knowledge of the ancients, mainly that of of Aristotle to form his worldview. He did not have the benefit of modern science. The discoveries of DesCartes, Bacon, Newton, Einstein and other modern thinkers and experimenters had not been made.
