RE: Is Accepting Christian Evidence Special Pleading?
September 12, 2017 at 11:48 am
(This post was last modified: September 12, 2017 at 11:49 am by Huggy Bear.)
(September 12, 2017 at 11:24 am)Astreja Wrote: A glitch on a piece of film, and you think that's a miracle?
Heeheeheeheehee!
If that's the best the Holy Spook can do, it can get stuffed.
If you actually took the time to read the report his conclusion is that there had to be a light there to strike the negative
![[Image: George%20Lacy%20Doc5.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.messagequotes.8m.net%2Fimages%2FGeorge%2520Lacy%2520Doc5.jpg)
Quote:Based upon the above described examination and study I am of the definite opinion that the negative submitted for examination, was not retouched nor was it a composite or double exposed negative.
Further, I am of the definite opinion that the light streak appearing above the head in a halo position was caused by the light striking the negative.
Respectfully submitted,
George J. Lacy.
*Emphasis mine*
Definite = positive; certain; sure:
so no, not a glitch...
(September 12, 2017 at 11:24 am)Astreja Wrote: As for the "American Society of Questioned Document Examiners," a quick glance at the Wikipedia page of the society's founders reveals that the page itself is being questioned for lack of citations -- and all the other listed presidents' names appear in red, indicating that there is no Wikipedia information at all on them. Oh, sweet irony...
You know you could have just gone directly to their website, all the information is there

http://www.asqde.org/about/presidents/lacy_g.html