RE: Is Accepting Christian Evidence Special Pleading?
September 12, 2017 at 1:01 pm
(This post was last modified: September 12, 2017 at 1:02 pm by Simon Moon.)
(September 12, 2017 at 12:54 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(September 12, 2017 at 12:34 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Hey asshole, it is up to YOU to prove that your stupid fucking fairy tales are TRUE. I cannot disprove delusions which exist in your mind. For all I know you are the craziest motherfucker on the planet. The evidence tends to that conclusion. You can't "prove" that Zeus doesn't exist so STFU and if you have evidence for your god let's see it.
I get really tired of dumb shits like you, Huggy.
Haven't been paying attention have you? I've presented evidence...
Furthermore you have made the claim that God doesn't exist, where is your evidence to back that up?
Your idea of what actually constitutes GOOD evidence is, shall we say, somewhat lacking. Videos of 'miracle claims' is about as far from reliable evidence as you can get.
Not sure who you are saying made the claim that god doesn't exist, but that is not the atheist position.
The basic atheist position is that the case for the existence of a god has not met its burden of proof. Atheism is a response to a claim, not a claim itself.
But you correct in one way, if someone makes the claim that gods do not exist, and they want to convince someone of that claim, then they do take on the burden of proof.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
