RE: Is Accepting Christian Evidence Special Pleading?
September 12, 2017 at 1:29 pm
(This post was last modified: September 12, 2017 at 1:31 pm by Astreja.)
(September 12, 2017 at 11:48 am)Huggy74 Wrote: If you actually took the time to read the report his conclusion is that there had to be a light there to strike the negative.
Huggy, in the final analysis all you have there is an unexplained bit of light contaminating some film. The light could have been a reflection off the camera lens by some transient illumination, or some other natural source. Calling it the Holy Spook is a massive, utterly unsupported jump to a patently ridiculous conclusion.
I cannot and will not say for certain that your god is fictional; however, I am strongly of the opinion that it almost certainly is fictional and simply not worth serious consideration. I am utterly appalled by the trivial and ambiguous things that you present as evidence.
(September 12, 2017 at 1:28 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: Actually that's wrong, placebos work even if you are told outright its a placebo. The brains funny like that.
I'm still shaking my head at how weird and counter-intuitive that effect is -- and wondering how one could go about exploiting and enhancing that brain glitch for overall better health.
