RE: Is Accepting Christian Evidence Special Pleading?
September 12, 2017 at 8:56 pm
(This post was last modified: September 12, 2017 at 8:57 pm by Simon Moon.)
(September 12, 2017 at 8:39 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(September 12, 2017 at 8:32 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: You didn't see the report of the scientific testing that was done to the negative?
It was the examiners own personal opinion that the light was supernatural, in other words THERE WAS NO EXPLANATION SCIENTIFIC OR OTHERWISE FOR WHY THE LIGHT WAS THERE.
What you guys have is SPECULATION based on nothing other than the opinion that the supernatural cannot exist...
He said no such thing. He said, and I quote (bold mine):
"Based upon the above described examination and study I am of the definite opinion that the negative submitted for examination, was not retouched nor was it a composite or double exposed negative.
Further, I am of the definite opinion that the light streak appearing above the head in a halo position was caused by the light striking the negative."
In other words, he said it was light.
Huggy lying?!
No! Tell me it ain't so...
No Christian has ever lied for Jesus.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
