RE: Is Accepting Christian Evidence Special Pleading?
September 12, 2017 at 10:49 pm
(This post was last modified: September 17, 2017 at 2:14 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
(September 12, 2017 at 8:32 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: It was the examiners own personal opinion that the light was supernatural, in other words THERE WAS NO EXPLANATION SCIENTIFIC OR OTHERWISE FOR WHY THE LIGHT WAS THERE.
The in caps is 1. Wholly irrelevant. 2. A perfect example of the Argument from Ignorance.
It's like if person A says that X is not necessarily a ghost and person B says "It has to be a ghost because: WHAT ELSE COULD IT HAVE BEEN?!"
Massive fallacy Huggy. Massive fallacy. Your mind is buggy, Huggy. Your mind is buggy, Buggy Huggy.
