Is Accepting Christian Evidence Special Pleading?

[Harry Nevis]

Lol, Huggy.  Tell us, which part of the scientific method did you use to determine that the light in your picture is the Holy Spirit?

You didn't see the report of the scientific testing that was done to the negative?

It was the examiners own personal opinion that the light was supernatural, in other words THERE WAS NO EXPLANATION SCIENTIFIC OR OTHERWISE FOR WHY THE LIGHT WAS THERE.

What you guys have is SPECULATION based on nothing other than the opinion that the supernatural cannot exist...

Because nobody cares.  Since there is no scientific explanation for a blob of light on a photo, does that equal god?  You have nothing but speculation either.

---

It's amazing the amount of mental gymnastics you guys perform when faced with scientific evidence that doesn't support your world view..

Fuck off. You're just an ignorant sore loser.

---

Huggy, I just read in the Wikipedia article on Branham that he taught -- among other *ahem* interesting things -- that Eve and the serpent had intercourse and their union produced Cain. This sounds suspiciously close to some similar nuttery you've spewed here before. Is Branham your source for your interpretation of the garden tale?

That "interpretation" is the traditional position found in the Talmud...

From a Jewish website
https://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/eve...nd-aggadah

According to another tradition, the serpent did indeed engage in intercourse with Eve, who became pregnant and gave birth to Cain (see below, “Now the Man Knew His Wife Eve”).

The Bible states that 'Cain was of (descended from) the wicked one', and furthermore Cain is not included in the Genealogy of Adam.

So he's a deluded wacko and his testimony can't be trusted.  What else you got?