(September 13, 2017 at 12:02 pm)TheBeardedDude Wrote:(September 13, 2017 at 11:56 am)SteveII Wrote: That's kind of evident in the fact that Paul was writing to pre-existing churches. Here is a secret code to keep them straight...the name of the church is in the letter's title...Corinthians, Romans, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, and Thessalonians.
LOL. You think I don't know the history of Christianity? You can't even get two sentences without messing them up!
You're in over your head in both knowledge of the subject in and in critical thinking skills.
Paul was writing to pre-existing "churches?" Is that so? So Paul has nothing to do with the foundation of Christianity? Without Paul, Christianity would still be around? [1]
Here, let's explore a second related piece. Which was more important to the Christian religion: Jesus or the Romans adopting Christianity? [2]
1. Yes, that is what he was doing. No, Paul did not found Christianity. He came later on the scene. His conversion was not until Acts 9--four years of activity before he comes on the scene. His first missionary journey was not for another fourteen years. He didn't start writing for at least another two after that. You really need to read Acts. It is actually the book written to answer these questions (Luke actually says that).
2. What kind of question is that? Constantine did not come for over 275 years (11 generations) after the first Christians. We have hundreds of surviving Christian writings from before Roman got involved.
