RE: Is Accepting Christian Evidence Special Pleading?
September 14, 2017 at 11:33 am
(This post was last modified: September 14, 2017 at 11:33 am by Huggy Bear.)
(September 13, 2017 at 12:32 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Huggy, do you think if you had presented this case to Carl Sagan with the evidence you've presented here, he would have come to the conclusion that the light in your picture was, beyond reasonable doubt, caused by the Holy Spirit of the Christian God of The Bible? Why, or why not?
No, Mr. Lacy didn't even draw that conclusion, but I do believe he would know the difference between supernatural and natural... which you clearly don't.
Branham is the one that said it was Jesus Christ, and not only that he demonstrated it.
Just know this, the evidence I presented in this thread is just the tip of the Iceberg, but there would be no point in taking it any further since it'd be lost on you yokels, heck there is a 30 some odd page thread with atheists arguing that Denmark had a secular government (which it doesn't)...
If they wouldn't accept evidence that contradicted their position on something that is easily proven and really not debatable, accepting evidence of the supernatural is completely out of the question.
Now you guys can no longer say that evidence has not been presented.
