RE: The Argument From Design
August 5, 2011 at 3:00 am
(This post was last modified: August 5, 2011 at 3:01 am by fr0d0.)
(August 4, 2011 at 8:49 am)Rhythm Wrote: "The bible is not factually accurate, but the biblical god still exists" Would that be a fair way to distill your argument Frodo?lol
I'll let you argue the facts with people who give a damn. The bible is about God, and it sets out the method of faith to believe in him. So both of your statements are innacurate.
(August 4, 2011 at 8:49 am)Rhythm Wrote: With respect to this thread, could that be stated as:There is no argument from design - an argument should prove something.
"The argument from design is not factually accurate, but God still exists"
(August 4, 2011 at 8:49 am)Rhythm Wrote: God is not a designer, right Frodo? Thats a material claim, and god belongs in the "metaphysical". Correct? You could correct me in your own words of course.God is a designer: Factoring in God, he is the source and maintainer of everything. Physical origins and processes are what we can study using the scientific method. God isn't limited to or by the physical. The physical is limited to the physical.