Is Accepting Christian Evidence Special Pleading?

[Amarok]

You mean the one where I included Carl Sagan explaining how interaction with a being from another dimension would work? Which in turn vindicates the Audio recording?

But you don't care about facts, LFC you never do...
https://atheistforums.org/thread-41513-p...pid1213780


Your bias is clear...

 
Yep.  And the difference between me and you is that I have, and will continue to admit my errors on the spot. That's not even the first thing I was wrong about in that thread.   I have been wrong, and admitted as such, many times over the course of two years here, debating atheists and theists alike.  I can admit to my prior biases.  I've been wrong about science, I've been wrong about history, and I've been wrong about logic.  I've committed logical fallacies, and accused others of committing them when they hadn't.  How else do you suppose one learns anything, Huggy?  Not you though.  You will go down with your self-respect, and take everyone along for the ride, rather than admit you fucked up.

 But you definitely were not wrong about the photo . Claims by Sagan or not.