RE: The Argument From Design
August 5, 2011 at 5:14 am
(This post was last modified: August 5, 2011 at 5:18 am by ElDinero.)
(August 5, 2011 at 1:06 am)Godschild Wrote: I have, your original post was to the evolutionist on this forum not the creationist, that's why I posted what I did. Corrected statement #3 for you, your welcome.
Is that a joke? Try again, dickhead. I'm going to spell it out for you so you can understand what I'm saying.
If we are designed, as you claim, why do we have all these useless body parts? What kind of design would allow a minority of pregnancies to reach full term?
Oh, and this was the post I wanted you to address, since you're too lazy/ignorant to actually read the posts:
(August 3, 2011 at 5:28 am)ElDinero Wrote: No, listen, Godschild. We don't have to address the human eye at all. YOU have to address all the things we've raised in this thread. Why do we have an appendix? Why are we made with two kidneys if we can live with one? Why is there so much of the Earth that is uninhabitable to humans? Why are we required to sleep approx 30% of our lives? Why do a minority of fertilised eggs make it to full term? What kind of design is this?
You can't point to one specific example (which can be explained, by the way) and say 'explain that, if you can't that means I'm right'. Because if it's designed, it ALL has to be designed. Every last thing, from the womb to the pineapple. So why don't you answer our questions about these undoubtedly poor 'designs'.
I noticed you already misrepresented what one person asked, they said why don't we have big pads instead of toes and you said that you'd fall over without your big toe. That isn't what they were suggesting. So please read my post carefully and be cautious not to twist what I have said. Thanks.
Now, stop dodging the questions, and answer them as well as you can. If you can only go off a Bible, which is a 'spiritual book', then stop making claims about the material world, or provide another source.
