(September 19, 2017 at 11:04 am)LadyForCamus Wrote:(September 19, 2017 at 10:15 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: It seems like an overly simple view, to only base it on the type of evidence, and not look at the details and context further. Also, where did you get these "unquestionably" remarks? At best, if you think the evidence is equal; you get to an agnostic position. And again, just because you disagree, doesn't make it special pleading. I think that you are trying to evaluate an overly simplified view, that doesn't represent what Steve believes.
I think you haven't been reading the thread, and you have no idea what you're talking about.
I think that your observation is spot-on as it is the same observation several others have also made.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media.giphy.com/media/FJovzGlbuoEXm/giphy.gif)