(August 5, 2011 at 3:15 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Excellent, a majority opinion, so you should have endless links to credible professionals saying exactly that. It would save a ton of time if you just went ahead and posted them here for me.
Where have you been? I already posted numerous experts ranging from church historians to science historians who profess at King's College and Oxford.
If the evidence were not overwhelming, why would someone like Richard Dawkins even concede this point? Is he just plain ignorant when it comes to the history of science?
