Is Accepting Christian Evidence Special Pleading?

[RoadRunner79]

---

It seems like an overly simple view, to only base it on the type of evidence, and not look at the details and context further.   Also, where did you get these "unquestionably" remarks?  At best, if you think the evidence is equal; you get to an agnostic position.  And again, just because you disagree, doesn't make it special pleading.  I think that you are trying to evaluate an overly simplified view, that doesn't represent what Steve believes.

I don't only look at it based on the "type" of "evidence." Please read what I have already written on this before straw manning me.

As for where did I get the "unquestionably" remarks, I get them from Christian theology. God's existence and the validity of the Bible are to be considered unquestionable evidence of a god if you are a christian. (I know this as a former christian)

And no, you don't get to assert if I should be an agnostic or an atheist. I think the evidence is all equally bullshit for all religions. I disbelieve them all, equally. That isn't what constitutes agnosticism. 

Disagreement isn't what makes it special pleading. This has already been explained multiple times by multiple people. 

No one can quite figure out what Steve believes because Steve constantly avoids questions while going back to the same special pleading arguments 

---

Sorry if I misunderstood. I was only loosely following the thread until recently, and went mostly off of what I saw the reason you gave in the immediate context (post)