RE: The Argument From Design
August 5, 2011 at 5:46 pm
(This post was last modified: August 5, 2011 at 5:47 pm by fr0d0.)
I don't make any plea at all Rhythm. I simply can't believe that you're this dumb. Honestly. You just keep hiding your head in the sand. I'm getting sick of repeating myself to you so this will be the last time ok.
I believe through faith (trust in information to which I give intellectual assent) IN God. You've got to be more than stupid to think that the Christian God defies his nature as desribed, that would contradict our (Christians) reasons to believe and be provable beyond doubt. As usual with all atheists I've ever met you seem unable to grasp this concept, whilst at the same time stating that you undesrtand Christianity (you didn't but a lot of atheists do).
To claim that something can't be unique is fallacial BTW. I'm not suggesting an exception to the rule for evidence gathering: I'm making a scientifically sound observation that the non physical cannot be measured using the scientific method. It isn't me making the exception, but science.
Please go find some scientists to beat you down over this. I'm sure they'd enjoy putting you straight.
I believe through faith (trust in information to which I give intellectual assent) IN God. You've got to be more than stupid to think that the Christian God defies his nature as desribed, that would contradict our (Christians) reasons to believe and be provable beyond doubt. As usual with all atheists I've ever met you seem unable to grasp this concept, whilst at the same time stating that you undesrtand Christianity (you didn't but a lot of atheists do).
To claim that something can't be unique is fallacial BTW. I'm not suggesting an exception to the rule for evidence gathering: I'm making a scientifically sound observation that the non physical cannot be measured using the scientific method. It isn't me making the exception, but science.
Please go find some scientists to beat you down over this. I'm sure they'd enjoy putting you straight.
