RE: Does Modern Science Owe Its Existence to Religion?
August 5, 2011 at 7:39 pm
(This post was last modified: August 5, 2011 at 7:57 pm by Statler Waldorf.)
(August 5, 2011 at 7:04 pm)Rhythm Wrote: You've been waiting for what was provided long ago. I gave you the bare bones If A and B then C. I assumed you needed a refresher, since you were unaware that mathematical theories can form the body of a logical argument. I also explained that even armed with this argument, we would still need to provide data, we would need observations confirming the theory. Logic only gets you so far.
...and I correctly pointed out that you were flat out wrong. Mathematical theorems and formulas are not logical proofs. Mathematical theorems and formulas can be created just as easily for things that don’t exist as things that exist. So you said you had logical proof for E.T. and multi-verses, I want to see this in the form of actual logical proof. Or can you not do this?
Logic can only get you so far? What are you filling the gaps with?
Well Rhythm,
Sadly I am logging off for the evening, and I have to coach at an XC camp until Wednesday. So I am sure you will miss me dearly, but I will be back :-P Take care.
