RE: Medical Hope for "Brain Dead"
September 26, 2017 at 3:16 pm
(This post was last modified: September 26, 2017 at 3:18 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
(September 26, 2017 at 3:06 pm)LastPoet Wrote:(September 26, 2017 at 12:55 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: Yeah. I learned, again, that some people on AF would rather criticize a theist than rejoice in a medical breakthrough.
Time for you to man up. Up to this point in thread, where have you been criticized? I see Lutrinae correcting you. Is correcting you equal to critic? Just so I know.
Here:
(September 26, 2017 at 12:51 pm)Minimalist Wrote: It's never a good day when religitards have their illusions shattered.
Not a criticism on this next one, but definitely a condescending tone:
(September 26, 2017 at 12:45 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: You learnt something today. Ain't that a good thing?
(September 26, 2017 at 1:22 pm)Minimalist Wrote: I'm sure the answer is "goddidit" or some such nonsense.
(September 26, 2017 at 2:07 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: You have far more faith in him then i do Thump
(September 26, 2017 at 2:27 pm)LastPoet Wrote: An erudite like Neo, tsk, equivocating such different states. Oh well, better try medicine school and fail, than to complete a theology course, IMHO.
(September 26, 2017 at 3:11 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: Well considering he started this topic and screwed it up ....
You're telling me if one of the popular members of this forum made this post people would be reacting the same way? Someone would have corrected the popular member, and that would be that. It wouldn't be taken as an opportunity to give the person crap and make the thread about them than the issue at hand.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
