Emotions are intrinsically good and bad

[The Grand Nudger]

You'd obstruct the real good of a satisfied sex offender just to satisfy your bad thoughts?  Seems to me that you're an agent of immorality even by your own standards...and your standards of immorality are.....novel.

All I said here was that any situation I think of as being bad during a moment where I felt nothing but a positive emotion would not be any real bad in my life.  Nonetheless, I would still make the choice to avoid that situation I thought of as being bad.

It isn't bad, though, by your metrics, and why are you deferring to your thoughts now, instead of those emotional metrics?

You must understand how I define misery and anhedonia.  

Oh, must I, lol?  I don't think so.  

I would actually define anhedonia as being an absence of those euphoric and dysphoric states while misery would be a dysphoric state.  I would not define anhedonia as being an absence of the thought (decision) form of emotions since I don't think they exist anyway.  From here, I define misery as being a dysphoric state.  Again, that state would not come about through our thoughts alone.

If anhedonia is the absence of euphoric and dysphoric states, as you just claimed.....and misery is being in a dysphoric state..then being in misery doesn't satisfy your own idiotic metrics..which is a problem you seem to keep running into.

You're shitposting as hard as you can trying to make your analogy stick to a vanishingly small subset of our population...and failing even at that. At some point, don't you think that this might warrant a modification of your position..rather than a continued insistence that it is still..somehow, despite all indications to the contrary, and it's absurdly inconsistent conclusions and compulsions...true?