I would be forced to believe.
But here's the thing. There are a lot of "ifs" in this scenario.
For instance, discovering that god is all good. That would immediately mean that the character, as described in the OT, didn't exist. At least not in the way he is described (jealous, spiteful, wrathful, etc). This immediately brings up the question on which is the true nature of the deity and, indeed, is the god before me the actual being from the OT?
Has he grown up/matured, into the being I've just met? Is the OT description completely wrong (making me question the veracity of the whole book).
If he was, indeed, misrepresented and has always been good, I guess I could support getting to know him better, though worship would be a long way off.
But here's the thing. There are a lot of "ifs" in this scenario.
For instance, discovering that god is all good. That would immediately mean that the character, as described in the OT, didn't exist. At least not in the way he is described (jealous, spiteful, wrathful, etc). This immediately brings up the question on which is the true nature of the deity and, indeed, is the god before me the actual being from the OT?
Has he grown up/matured, into the being I've just met? Is the OT description completely wrong (making me question the veracity of the whole book).
If he was, indeed, misrepresented and has always been good, I guess I could support getting to know him better, though worship would be a long way off.
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"