(October 8, 2017 at 9:40 am)chimp3 Wrote: As far as I know, boy/child soldiers are usually a sign of desperation on the part of an army.
WW1 and 2 consumed lives in a way that causes desperation if you think about it.
Trench warfare is a living hell, I don't think generals would think a lot about replacing the dead with kids if the price was winning the war.