RE: Supermathematics and Artificial General Intelligence
October 23, 2017 at 7:32 pm
(This post was last modified: October 23, 2017 at 7:39 pm by causal code.)
(October 23, 2017 at 4:56 am)Mathilda Wrote: He loses credence with the opening paragraphs in his github project and the downloadable article ...
Quote:This thread concerns attempts to construct artificial general intelligence, which I often underline may likely be mankind’s last invention.
I clearly unravel how I came to invent the supermanifold hypothesis in deep learning,
First rule of science is to not claim anything more than what can be backed up by the results otherwise your paper will get rejected and your research will never be built upon by someone else. Which is preferable to being crucified when you're standing up there presenting your work.
You're right, I don't see any results in the OP's paper, and that's a really bad sign.
My 10 cents:
According to a quora answer, the OP's paper seems to be talking about turning the "Hamiltonian" seen in quantum reinforcement learning into a "Super Hamiltonian" instead, inspired by "evidence" about supersymmetry in the brain.
(If Perez et al.'s paper about supersymmetric "evidence" in biological brain is valid, then the OP's paper would be interesting, because it says this would be a way to "capture" certain "physics priors", and in reality, babies are actually observed to know physics intuitively according to Stahl et al)
Eta: The "Transverse Field Ising Spin Super Hamiltonian" in the screenshot from reply 28, seems to be possible, according to this "SQCD" paper.
I also notice the OP's paper cites yet another paper, that also has no experimental results. "The Consciousness Prior" by Yoshua Bengio.
Anyway, forgetting about the OP's paper for now, what are your thoughts on Bengio's paper Mathilda?
