RE: Let us go back to "cold" hard logic."Time"
November 5, 2017 at 5:22 pm
(This post was last modified: November 5, 2017 at 5:34 pm by bennyboy.)
(November 5, 2017 at 3:29 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: There are some low people but you are next to new level of low.
So I shared I see a doctor and have bipolar, schizophrenia, and other mental illnesses, in the past even before as non-Muslim, and you know I been seeing a doctor, but want to belittle me because of my illness.
Since you work with the material paradigm that our brain defines who we are, you can't understand how I have fractured mind, but still reason better than you.
I got A+ in a logic philosophy course, I get A+ in computer science courses I take, I don't give a damn that my mind is fractured, I will manipulate it and heal it through will and strength, and that will and strength is no doubt from God and his help is ever with me.
Now, why don't you go concentrate on some material pleasure or go conjecture like you always do or go try to insult another Theist? Run along now.
MK, to be frank, I don't think you really needed to share this. Based on some of the things you've presented here, it would have been understood or assumed anyway. Seeing patterns where there aren't really any to be seen is one of the hallmarks. That's why many schizophrenics are viewed as geniuses-- they can make connections others were unable to make, and turn out to be right. However, in some of your logical chains, there are some very weak links, so that seems unlikely to be the case here.
I think your points #1 and #2 do NOT show tight logic at all, and if I was your teacher, I certainly wouldn't give you an A+ for stating them. It's very much under dispute whether there's such a thing as free will, or what the words even mean. You don't get to say, "If free will A. And free will, so A." Surely, no philosophy teacher would allow this chain to take flight. Don't believe me? Present THIS argument to them, and see what they say.