RE: Let us go back to "cold" hard logic."Time"
November 10, 2017 at 12:07 pm
(This post was last modified: November 10, 2017 at 12:08 pm by Mystic.)
Another thing - this is a side note - but I can prove this argument with this fill as well.
Nose analogy with the line, the line has a start and then begins to span infinite from there.
The present time would be the nose - while the line spans infinitely in the past. Then the start of the line would be the present, spanning infinitely back. And that line would move on to another. So it can't be the start of the line in this sense either. If time is linear, it cannot be that the present which changes moment to moment is the base point of an it's infinite nature.
This is a different proof but can be substituted to prove time had a start.
Nose analogy with the line, the line has a start and then begins to span infinite from there.
The present time would be the nose - while the line spans infinitely in the past. Then the start of the line would be the present, spanning infinitely back. And that line would move on to another. So it can't be the start of the line in this sense either. If time is linear, it cannot be that the present which changes moment to moment is the base point of an it's infinite nature.
This is a different proof but can be substituted to prove time had a start.