RE: When does biblical history begin ?
November 17, 2017 at 10:26 pm
(This post was last modified: November 17, 2017 at 10:27 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(November 17, 2017 at 9:44 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote:*emphasis mine*(November 17, 2017 at 7:47 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Personally I think the bible becomes real history with the story of Jesus. We have historical evidence of His existence, His death by crucifixion, His 12 disciples and their deaths, and the rapid spread of very early Christianity.There was no one named "Jesus" in ancient times. The name didn't exist until 1630, which is 387 years ago.
I'm not opposed to believing in some Old Testament people as having been real people (like Abraham for example), but don't believe things played out literally as they are written.
I don't think original sin = Adam and Eve eating a forbidden apple. I think that's allegory for the first opportunity we had to sin, which was taken. I think this "opportunity" happened somewhere along the evolutionary process of homo sapiens. At some point, enough "clicked" in the brain of an early human to where they became aware of morality in their actions. That's original sin. It's the fact that we can and will commit sins, given the opportunity.
That's my own opinion of how it played out, anyway. The Church leaves the story of Genesis open to interpretation, so long as we come away from it believing that God is the creator and that human beings have original sin.
Now since almost everything you know is less than 100 years old why do you continue to believe silly ancient fairy tales?
You do realize that the King James version of the bible was published in 1611 right? Not to mention the name also appears in the Wycliffe version of the bible (although it's written in middle english) published in the late 1300's