Hall of wit and epicness.

[Edwardo Piet]

I guess there's no reason we can't put ourselves in the hall of wit and epicness if we genuinely think we've made a post that is epic and/or witty.

Ergo:

If I may interject . . .

. . . I would love anyone to give an example of what non-physical evidence of anything could even conceivably be in principle without being a self-contradictory concept. Doesn't the concept of evidence, by its very nature, presuppose something that can at least in principle be evident to us, and aren't we physical beings, and can't evidence only be evident to physical beings . . . physically?

I thought I'd put it here because I am sure no one else would put it here. And, regardless of how bigheaded putting one of my own posts here may seem to make me, I doubt anyone else will find this epic but I think this epic and this at least gives others the chance to ask themselves if maybe this is epic.

I don't think it's witty. So I guess it goes under 'epic'.

(Bloody hell saying that sounds arrogant. I guess I believe it's 'epic' in the sense that extremely mild redness that looks exactly like pink is 'red'. Pink is not what I'd really call red and this post is not what I'd really call epic but it's on the spectrum and it's possible that pinkness to someone would look dark enough to seem red to them even when it isn't red it's pink, or this post I just quoted would seem interesting enough to someone that they would deem it epic even if it isn't epic they're merely interested in it to enough of an extent to like it like I like it. And I guess I like it like I like my posts sometimes and maybe this more than others hence why I put it here just like I like myself sometimes and sometimes more than others hence why despite not feeling proud about anything I do experience my own Hammy equivalent of pride. Which is usually something along the lines of "I am not pride because I ultimately take no credit for my own actions but I am glad I did what I did and I feel lucky to be myself for happening to engage in this behavior successfully right now". )

I was going for substance rather than flashiness. Although I know I often come across like I'm trying to look smart rather than actually being smart, hence why people often say what I right is word salad, or 'nonsense', or 'bollocks', and why many would think I was trying too hard to be witty or flashy rather than being anything even remotely close to epic or writing anything of any real substance. Overly verbose means necessarily lacking in substance, no? (being ironic there).

I guess maybe people are right about me, and I probably feel otherwise because I'm suffering from Dunning Kruger and love the sound of my own voice and blind to my own flaws and lack of depth. And I think I'm smarter than I am.

I can imagine many people thinking "What on earth are you going on about?". And I can imagine many people thinking that it must be nonsense therefore. Or that, no, it is not that it must be nonsense and that they can't make sense of it because it doesn't make sense, but it really is nonsense regardless.

Why do I post these things.