(November 23, 2017 at 4:30 am)pool the matey Wrote: Wow that's seem unfairWhat Magi said, yes.
Aroura Wrote:so they would have built in incentives to feed you their stuff at top speed, while throttling competitive website speeds down so they are basically unusable
So like if my normal internet speed is this much (for all websites):
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
And Facebook pays for more speed will I:
a) get Facebook in this speed:
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
And every other site in this speed:
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
OR
b) get Facebook in this speed:
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
And every other site in this speed:
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
(in this case the speed Facebook paid for is subtracted from the speed of sites that didn't pay, in the first case the speed of other sites remain the same and Facebook gets a additional boost)
But as to the speed, you won't get anything faster than it already exists.
Basically, you already get everything at the fastest possible speeds.
The money would only keep those sites at the fastest possible speed, while throttling down others.
There is absolutely no reason to move it back to title I regulations. It has not harmed the industry, and it has protected consumers.
“Eternity is a terrible thought. I mean, where's it going to end?”
― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead
― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead