RE: How do religious people justify raising and slaughtering animals for food?
November 29, 2017 at 6:21 am
(This post was last modified: November 29, 2017 at 6:23 am by Catholic_Lady.)
Raising them poorly/inhumanely is immoral, yes. But the notion of raising animals to eat them in and of itself is not immoral when done humanely.
I don't see why it makes a difference to you, whether someone is religiois or not in this case. If you think raising/eating animals is immoral, it should be immoral for everyone. I don't see why you think religious people need to justify an action and atheist people don't have to justify that same action.
No it's not.
I don't see why it makes a difference to you, whether someone is religiois or not in this case. If you think raising/eating animals is immoral, it should be immoral for everyone. I don't see why you think religious people need to justify an action and atheist people don't have to justify that same action.
(November 29, 2017 at 6:07 am)Aroura Wrote: It's our fault because Adam and Eve disobeyed God. God designed a pain free world and humans Fucked it up, free will blah blah.
That's what they'll say, you know.
The Matrix has less plot holes.
No it's not.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
