List of reasons to believe God exists?

[SteveII]

What "relevant facts of a matter can change" on a moral question like abortion that does not involve "biases caused by feelings, ideas, opinions, etc., of a sentient subject"? Is there metaphysical reasoning you can employ? Is there scientific reasons you can trot out? Please be specific because it really seems the crux of the abortion issue always was, is, and always will change based on an opinion of relative value of the mother's reasons against that of the unborn baby.

You'd have to be more specific in asking the question and more specific in providing the exact justifications for a position yay or nay to get a meaningful answer to that question....and what happened last time you asked as much?

Ya failed to follow through, didn't ya?    Would you like another opportunity to provide an example of a victorian moral objection to abortion....so that we can assess whether or not it accurately reported any fact that was true then or now, and now..additionally..whether it reported some fact that might have been true then but is not true now?

And my contention is that there are no changes to the relevant facts from then until now that are not "biases caused by feelings, ideas, opinions, etc., of a sentient subject". I am not aware of any metaphysical reasoning nor relevant scientific understanding that would avoid the conclusion that the abortion issue always was, is, and always will be based on an opinion of relative value of the mother's concerns/desires against that of the unborn baby's life--a conclusion that is the very epitome of subjective.  Unless you can provide some, you have lost the debate.