Why does science always upstage God?

[Mister Agenda]

It's reasonable to accept that conclusion based on the available evidence.

https://phys.org/news/2015-02-big-quantu...verse.html

The universe may have existed forever, according to a new model that applies quantum correction terms to complement Einstein's theory of general relativity. The model may also account for dark matter and dark energy, resolving multiple problems at once.

So which is it?

---

Where , in any religious text it says that it isn't 14 bilion years old ?

Not sure of what point you're trying to make.

It can be, and may well be, both. The universe (the space-time continuum of which we are a part) is in the neighborhood of 14 or 15 billion years old. Before Planck time, the math and physics break down and we don't know what was going on. The universe in the larger sense may be have existed forever in some sense; but our cosmos dates from the initial expansion. What preceded the expansion may have been a microscopic point that existed forever but never expanded before, a cyclic universe that expands and contracts, or one that manages to both keep expanding and 'keep banging', or a multiverse that births universes, of which ours is one. For all reasonable intents and purposes though, our universe started 14 or 15 billion years ago.

---

*emphasis mine*
NEWS FLASH: ABIOGENESIS IS A BELIEF ALSO! Apparently we can't be "arsed" to challenge any of YOUR beliefs ...
Also since when has an 'explanation' become evidence?

The 'hows' of abiogenesis are hypotheses. The fact of abiogenesis is that it is impossible for biological life to have always existed. Even God breathing life into dust is technically abiogenesis, unless you're saying God is alive in the biological sense, made of molecules, having a metabolism, and all that....