(December 28, 2017 at 11:01 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Thats not at all what she said. She said there are both legitimate women's issues AND legitimate men's issues. And that she supports BOTH. She doesn't mention the word equalitarianism, but that's what she described in the end.
My issue was when she said this:
Quote:"It's no secret now that I no longer call myself a feminist..."
Why not? Just because she discovered MRAs have a point? Why stop calling herself a feminist? I didn't really criticize her for it, but I did point out that it was odd. After all, the thrust of her argument was that MRAs are not opposed to feminism but are rather focusing on men's causes that need attention.
That's what I was saying before... If you advocate for more fairness in custody hearings, you are a men's rights activist. If your view is that "feminism has gone too far" this does nothing to advance men's issues-- it is just standing in the way of women's advancement. One is actual men's rights activism. The other is not.
