(August 23, 2011 at 10:52 am)theVOID Wrote: It's not the TAG, that argument deals with the existence of the 'logical absolutes', what you're referring to is the "Moral argument" for the existence of God.
Thanks. My bad. I'd lumped them together in my mind because the arguments are so similar. Thanks for setting me straight.
Quote:As for objective morality - given that you accept a few premises I can make a case for it, but it's almost 3AM, I'll get around to it later
Just to be clear, I welcome discussions of non-theistic objective morality as well.
These are separate issues that can be arranged in a quadrant:
1. God exists, objective morality exists.
2. God exists, morality is subjective.
3. God does not exist, objective morality exists.
4. God does not exist, morality is subjective.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
