RE: Men's Rights Movement
December 30, 2017 at 9:12 pm
(This post was last modified: December 30, 2017 at 9:17 pm by Amarok.)
Because there is no better evidence they can only complain about perceived flaws in one set of data . And none have even touched the data i presented . Which further reinforces the claim in the articles .
(December 30, 2017 at 9:12 pm)SaStrike Wrote:You probably should give up . Because this statement makes zero sense . I no i have not been tricked i think you have been .(December 30, 2017 at 9:05 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: Sigh no it dose not . And the rest of the data is a moot point . And no it does not prove male discrimination .
Still does not mean you need do it back
...
if there are 10 cases. 2 of these cases meet the criteria of women working more hours than men and this has a 50-50 split. that means 1 case of 2. not 5 of 10. i give up on trying to explain this to you now. the article tricked you. nothing more i can do.
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Inuit Proverb
