Why does science always upstage God?

[Huggy Bear]

And in case Huggy is to lazy to read 

http://sciencenordic.com/inbreeding-scan...we-thought

“We have seen some individual consequences of inbreeding, such as dental defects, skeletal defects and sterility in some males. But we see the consequence of inbreeding most clearly in the size of the family groups,” Flagstad said.
The size of family groups is determined each winter by examining tracks and scat.
"What we see is that parents who are severely inbred have fewer offspring. A smaller proportion of their pups grow to adulthood. The close kinship seems to affect the survival of pups and reproduction in adult wolves,” says Flagstad.

Also 

In many of the inbred wolves, researchers found many identical genes from both the parents. Over time, this strong genetic similarity may make the animals more susceptible to genetic diseases and the species less adaptable overall

And 

For long-term survival, Flagstad believes that it is important that new wolves come in from the outside world.

Let me refer back to your earlier quote:

Actually you never addressed this . It remains a fact that any population born of only two creatures would suffer massive amounts of genetic defects . Which is why incest is dangerous .

From your own link which you refer to as the "death nail" (it's knell btw)

And of course the real death nail
http://sciencenordic.com/inbreeding-scan...we-thought

Inbreeding does not seem to have hurt the Scandinavian population so far, but Flagstad says there have been some effects.

*emphasis mine*
Obviously inbreeding does not cause the massive amounts of genetic defects you claim it does.

I rest my case.