(January 1, 2018 at 9:48 am)cosmology Wrote: Is it necessary to debate between atheism and a religion?
The bold man has no hair. We can say, what he has non-existent hair. The atheist comes to any theist, looks at his god. This god has following properties, according to theist: existent, loving, judging, omnipresent (or any properties the theist thinks of his god). Then, the procedure of atheism removes one single property from this list: existence. Remains: loving, judging, omnipresent, etc.
So, the atheists encompasses all gods of theism-s, but removing the property of existence. So, one can finally conclude what atheism is: it is having the Nonexistent Loving God, so an atheist feels free today to love and tomorrow to reject love's existence. Am I right?
No need for militant atheism -- Existent God and Nonexistent God are two different Gods:
>snip<
Moderator Notice
Video link snipped for violating 30/30 rule.
~SC
There are no existent gods. That is our stance unless someone can prove otherwise.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
