Does atheism oppose the world religions?

[bennyboy]

Is it necessary to debate between atheism and a religion?

The bold man has no hair. We can say, what he has non-existent hair. The atheist comes to any theist, looks at his god. This god has following properties, according to theist: existent, loving, judging, omnipresent (or any properties the theist thinks of his god). Then, the procedure of atheism removes one single property from this list: existence. Remains: loving, judging, omnipresent, etc.
So, the atheists encompasses all gods of theism-s, but removing the property of existence. So, one can finally conclude what atheism is: it is having the Nonexistent Loving God, so an atheist feels free today to love and tomorrow to reject love's existence. Am I right?

No need for militant atheism -- Existent God and Nonexistent God are two different Gods:
>snip<

Moderator Notice
Video link snipped for violating 30/30 rule.
~SC

lol wut?

Atheists, for the most part, look at definitions of God and demonstrate them to be logically incoherent.  Demonstrate that the supposed properties of a God cannot logically coexist, and you demonstrate that the God idea being put forth by another person cannot represent an existent being.

For example, God cannot be all-loving, all-knowing and all-powerful, or innocents (like babies) would not be allowed by Him to suffer.  That innocent babies suffer is good evidence that such a God idea cannot represent an actual existent being.

This does not remove only "existence" from that idea of God-- it makes all the other properties irrelevant, since their is no existent being which can possibly have them.