(January 8, 2018 at 6:37 pm)Brian37 Wrote:(January 8, 2018 at 3:39 pm)Mr.Obvious Wrote: Brian, I don't have anything against Oprah. But being smart, not having money handed to you and being backed by the Obama's are not reasons to vote for someone, to me.
It's not about any of that. If Neil deGrasse Tyson were to run for president, I would have my reservations as well.
He's really smart. He's not a spoiled brat. He might get support from the Obama's.
But would he be a good president for your country? I don't see why he would be.
Quick addition (edit): Don't get me wrong, being smart is important. But there are a shitload of smart people out there. And a shitload who are smart in different ways. And while I hope the US president will be smart, it is not enough to be smart to vote for someone.
Ugggg.....
It seems that even liberals want it the same way as conservatives.
We all want somebody new, and with experience at the same time.
If we don't want career politicians that would require new blood. And Obama ONLY had 3 years before he ran. McConnell sucked the dick of Andrew Jackson.
It amounts to picking your battles.
Face facts Brian, Oprahs policies wouldn't stray far from typical hard right policies, apart from increased support for woo cures to health problems.
As a woman totally dependant on the current system, Oprah's not going to bite the corporate hand that feeds her.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home