RE: Van Tillian/Clarkian Presuppositional Apologetics.
August 24, 2011 at 5:06 pm
(This post was last modified: August 24, 2011 at 5:13 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
You realize that the entire point of TANG was to be refuted right? It was a giant joke on you godly types. If TANG is invalid, so is TAG, they are identical in form and function. TANG simply takes the opposite assumption. 
The lesson to be learned; "Is" does not imply "ought". Going from factual claims to ethical claims is fruitless.
(This entire discussion has been facepalm example No2, for those that follow such threads)
The lesson to be learned; "Is" does not imply "ought". Going from factual claims to ethical claims is fruitless.
(This entire discussion has been facepalm example No2, for those that follow such threads)
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
