(January 4, 2018 at 1:33 pm)Radieo31 Wrote: I am not really arguing for "Religious foundamentlism" i am not really anti religious but i am against fundamentalism just due to what happens if a society has a totalitarian regime.
However, what i am saying is let society be realistic. Wanna know why i think its bad? Because i saw Aldous Huxley's Brave New World.
I dont know about you but this is nightmare material to me.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brave_New_World#Plot
Here is the link to the plot on wikipedia if not i have some youtube links to explain it more. It would be a hedonistic nightmare.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raqVySPrDUE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ek5vse2_Aq0
I've only read the first few responses so someone will have already said this no doubt but ..
It is hard to understand what you think "atheism in control" would even mean. Atheism is simply not theism. That hardly constitutes much of a policy base. It could mean as little as "governance without regard to religion". Hard to get worked up over that.