(January 23, 2018 at 9:34 am)AtlasS33 Wrote:(January 23, 2018 at 7:46 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote: There's no such thing as an "infedel" let alone an "infedel jihadist". Jihadism is purely an invention of your particular superstitious belief system.
Further, if it is good enough for you to spout your particular brand of delusional theism, it is good enough for me or anyone else to oppose it.
I wonder why it is that you are so filled with fear that you want to suppress criticism of your faith. If it were true, it would need have no concern over any criticism. But you are terrified of anyone disagreeing with you. Why?
I think I said in my previous post:
Quote:Why? just why can't you "live up to the claim of being normal", and post like a normal person, instead of a keyboard infedel jihadist?
Don't pick up cyber fights. It hurts your brain and the brain of others.
And, what is this word; "Jihad"?
It seems like a sandwich name. So it'll be like "I want double Jihad with extra cheese; tasty with spicy Osama with vegetables"..
Right?
It's a "type of beards" that blow up. Time bombs; and not farts; the shit blows up for real!
Jihad. Prounce it as "Jeeeehad".
Now seriously..
"Jihad" is an Arabic; in Arabic it's written like this:
جهاد
It's derive from the word "Johd"
جهد
Which means "Effort". So "Jihad" is a description for the "putting effort". So, you realize how ignorant you sound to me when you discuss matters with me from a rightist base.
What are the Christian crusaders? aren't they "contributors of effort in the path of Jesus"? i.e "Christian Jihadists"?
But you seem like an atheist Jihadist. Putting effort in the cause and all..Jihading me.
Atheism is not a religion, not a belief, it has no scriptures, it has no prophets, it has no authorities, it has none of those appurtenances of religion. Jihad is an exclusive islamic concept and a religious concept. Whatever it may be that you claim it might mean is irrelevant. You could claim it means unicorns and rainbows. That matters not. In atheism, it simply does not exist. Islam exclusively owns that term and has chosen to make it sinister. The issue remains between you and your fellow religionists. I don't have a religion, so how superstitious believers define "jihad" is irrelevant. It is not a concept atheists hold in any way.
