RE: The Trinity Doctrine: Help me out, Christians
February 2, 2018 at 9:04 am
(This post was last modified: February 2, 2018 at 9:48 am by LadyForCamus.)
(February 2, 2018 at 7:18 am)Huggy74 Wrote:(February 2, 2018 at 7:13 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: Says the guy who rambled on for five or so pages about a hybrid man-snake. I can’t even...lol.First of all no one claimed it was a man-snake thats another lie.
Also it's s not something I just made up out of thin air luv, the fact that the serpent wasn't originally a snake is staight ouf of Jewish teachings...
I can post receipts if you'd like
I notice how you couldn't deny what I said, you could only deflect on to some unrelated nonsense that isn't been true...
What, exactly, am I supposed to be refuting again? The Trinity happens to be in that category of things Christians assert, that I find so utterly, pathetically idiotic, that I don’t even bother to comment. I just found it funny that you were accusing Grand of trolling because he was continuing a discussion with your fellow theists on a matter that you and your fellow theists dissgree, rather than addressing them directly. This is a Theist/Theist problem, you see. And yes please, make a fool of yourself again by regurgitating that nonsense if you like. I’ll get the popcorn.
(February 2, 2018 at 7:47 am)possibletarian Wrote:(January 31, 2018 at 1:38 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: If you're going to believe in God, it's perfectly logical that there will be things that are beyond our comprehension. God is supposed to be a much more advanced entity than us, and it makes sense that there would be much associated with Him and how He works than we can fully wrap our heads around.
I rather think that is the point, if it is beyond comprehension then why have it as a doctrine at all ?
Over the years I've seen people try and explain it, all unsatisfactory, I'm convinced it's simply (at least as presented to us) a made up doctrine to attempt to explain some of the things Jesus supposedly said and portrayed himself to be.
(February 2, 2018 at 7:27 am)Khemikal Wrote: Get it right camus, it was a fucking dragon, lol.
And everyone knows dragons are real. I love how theists get all dramatic that you misrepresents one farcical talking creature with another, as though that would make it somehow more acceptable and rational.
Roo, I’m waiting for Huggy to figure out that every time we have this discussion, I use the word ‘snake’ instead of ‘serpent’, on purpose, because it amuses me to no end when he corrects me, lol
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
