Western terrorism.

[The Grand Nudger]

No. Contexts decide what we should speak or not speak about.
First, you name your context; that is called "Topic's title".
Second, you write down what you want to speak about.
A reply to the post, must be related totally or partially to its content's subject.
What you're doing, is taking huge turns to avoid the direct subject; and the main subject of the topic.
The context again is "western terrorism": The western regimes and governments were built after rivers of blood, represented in the intentional murder of 100 Million people including large numbers of civilians. We discussed the American & British bombing of the city of Hamburg during the war as an example of the terrorism. These two super powers targeted children and civilians with incendiary weapons; creating one of the largest firestorms in history.
^The above is the context.
What does Islam has to do with it?
What is the justification of such crimes against humanity?

War, Atlas, as far as it goes.  If the allies had precision munitions then perhaps they'd have used them..we certainly like to use them now..but they didn't.  The laziest google search would explain the military value of Hamburg as a target and the reason for such broad civilian casualties as a consequence of technology.  There are other bombings that more closely mirror terrorism..though not quite..and another lazy google search would disabuse you of your misapprehensions in this regard.  This has been true every time you start ranting about this.  

There is 100 Million people murdered by the hand of the regimes controlling that culture!
And since that day, the killing won't stop: civilians are being killed under different names like "War on Terror".
Do you realize what 100 Million dead in 10 years mean?

It means the world was at war.  Terrorists can only dream of such lethal efficiency, as of yet.  They are dreaming about it, though..aren't they..god willing..and he certainly does will as far as they're concerned.

Your justification for the killing and the burning of Hamburg, Dresden, and other numerous places, the nuking of Hiroshima & Nagazaki, the intentional targeting of women and children who are not fighters, from the east to the west; is that a 20,000 Arab militia, was in the war ?

That's you justification ?

OFC not you numbskull, lol.  I see you can use the internet though..and that makes the rest of the thread difficult to understand.  I'm simply pointing out that "the west" in your example of "western terrorism" included muslims who were instrumental in securing the oilfields upon which the axis war machine depended, and participated as axis forces in the perpetuation of the war and killing.