[split] AF Hall of Shame, various discussion including Denmark & bible contradiction

[Shell B]

As i already pointed out a state religion that is voluntary is [i]not much of a state religion .[/b] And considering the church does not seem to have any pragmatic power in Denmark  . It's presence seems more cremonial then actual governing power . And again considering  Denmark  provides freedom of religion and by theory from religion  which ultimately undermines a state religion . I again argue it's only a state religion in name not practice .  Which might as well be a secular government .

Bold mine.

"Not much of a state religion" is still a state religion. You said yourself it's a state religion in name, though not in practice. I don't think the argument was about the practice of it, but rather it's existence. This needs to be clearly defined and agreed upon by both parties for this to even be a debate, let alone a "won" debate.

You guys are kind of arguing two different points. If we're talking about whether the people of the country are religious, you've got a point. If we're talking about whether the government is secular or not, Huggy has a point.

If you want to call it a debate, Huggy, you guys are going to need to set definitions of terms. This is all semantic bullshit.