(May 14, 2009 at 10:47 am)athoughtfulman Wrote: The priest's belief is non-sensical.
If no one is right and no one is wrong, then how can he be right about believing that no one is right or wrong? His belief is self-refuting. How can he be right in believing that life itself that is experienced thru others and religion is also something you experience and use as a tool to experience life if no one is right or wrong?
I agree with you, he doesn't make specilly much sence. I have asked a similar question like you did. He just say simply that you can't be right or wrong when it comes to religion. Which is pretty much what he says when i ask how he can believe what he believe. He also think religion is not what religion often is defined as.
I will try to email him tomorrow. I'm sick today so I don't feel for it today. So far have I discussed the bible, Jesus and of course what belive God is. He don't belvie in the bible literally. He don't beleive in a objectified god, as I said he jsut explain it as experiences in life. He primary chose to be christian since he think that the christian message is something that suits him well.
But I will try to ask him more tomorrow and see if I can get more from him. It have been so far quite hard to understand what he relly mean. He has a little bit fuzzy opinions.
- Science is not trying to create an answer like religion, it tries to find an answer.