(March 2, 2018 at 2:18 am)orthodox-man Wrote:(March 2, 2018 at 1:01 am)Grandizer Wrote: near-death.com also doesn't look credible to me. It's too focused on woo as well.
Note about the credible journal sites: It's always good to distinguish between the results of a study, and the interpretations of these results and conclusions drawn. Don't be quick to jump to extraordinary conclusions when the results are yet inconclusive. There may very well be a naturalistic explanation for the apparent vividness of NDEs that has yet to be picked up on (it it hasn't been already).
Good point and I agree with you. In some past comments I admitted that: even if we can't explain it doesn't make it supernatural. I still don't get 2 things fully: consistency in hell ndes and the fact that christians tend to report seeing Jesus quite often while people from other faiths don't report seeing as many of their dieties ex: Muhammad or Krishna. However, that may have more to do with conditioning. Anyways, I want to see more studies. If more and more studies keep failing, I will have no choice but to reject my potential thought of afterlife, and I will become atheist.
Ok, what have we failed to address with regards to the bolded? I thought it was very clear what the counterarguments were in the other threads you made?
