Who is 'we'?
The science community have perfectly reasonable explanations for near, death experiences. You on the other hand have some deep seated need to believe something else is going on, but unless you abandon youtube and the myriad new age bullshit websites you will never learn anything. Your approach is a textbook example of conformation bias, pseudo-science. You have started with a conclusion and are now looking for evidence to support that conclusion. You cannot deny this, your post's speak for themselves.
I would wish you well in your endeavours but it would be a wasted gesture unless you adopt a different approach. But I doubt that is going to happen any time soon.
The science community have perfectly reasonable explanations for near, death experiences. You on the other hand have some deep seated need to believe something else is going on, but unless you abandon youtube and the myriad new age bullshit websites you will never learn anything. Your approach is a textbook example of conformation bias, pseudo-science. You have started with a conclusion and are now looking for evidence to support that conclusion. You cannot deny this, your post's speak for themselves.
I would wish you well in your endeavours but it would be a wasted gesture unless you adopt a different approach. But I doubt that is going to happen any time soon.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.
